Is the history repeating? Neutral America needed a cover again to enter a "war".

Facts: America started neutral WW2, until Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. We already know that the american guverniment knew with three days before about the japaneze l attack at Perl Harbor. No action was taken, becouse America needed a "legal" reason to enter the war. Same actions were token on september 2001; America needed a reason ( a "legal reason"?) to attack Irak (terrorist countries). How far will America go ? Could it be that the White House, in its phoney 'War on Terror', has unwittingly fulfilled the Biblical prophecy of the White Horse?

Why was America and the world never shown the video and photographs of the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed showing only one 16 ft. hole.  Many people do not realize that the outer wall did not collapse until a full 20 minutes after the initial impact.

Given that the outer wall of the Pentagon had not yet collapsed and the only hole is approximately 16 ft. in diameter - how does a plane over 44 feet tall and 125 ft. wide fit into that hole as shown in the crystal-clear and close-up photographic evidence from the Pentagon?  Furthermore, can physics explain why there is no damage to the Pentagon's upper floors where the tail section would have hit?

“I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound.  I was convinced it was a missile.  It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.”
Lon Rains - editor for Space News

In the aftermath, it was reported by media sources that a giant 100 ft. crater was plowed into the front lawn of the Pentagon as the result of a powerful airliner crash?  Why does photographic evidence overwhelmingly show that this was absolutely not the case?  Why no crater?  Why no skid marks?  Why no burn marks?  Why was the entire world deliberately mislead?  Examine the video and photographic evidence for yourself.

How does a Boeing 757, constructed from lightweight aluminum, penetrate over 9 ft. of steel reinforced concrete?  Photographs and recently discovered computer animations help shed light on this unexplained feat of physics.

Contrary to the pictures shown to the American public, after the fact, why does photographic evidence taken only a few moments after the Pentagon event show no wreckage on the lawn of the Pentagon?  Where is the plane?  Where is the tail, the wings, the luggage, the seats, the landing gear; the engines?  What happened to the passengers?  Examine the photos that you were never meant to see.

At the World Trade Center, why did firefighters, reporters and other on the scene eyewitnesses describe a demolition-like, pancake collapse of buildings One, Two & Seven?  Hear the outrageous admissions made by the building lease owner recorded on video, plus shocking new video evidence helps to answer some of these important questions.

What is the bright flash on the right side of the Boeing 767, seen just before impact on both the North Tower & the South Tower, captured on video by 5 separate cameramen including CNN and ABC?  Slow motion analysis reveals startling verification of this extraordinary event and begs the question, "What is it?"
Find out what former military personnel think this could be.

Why were there numerous reports of bombs & explosions going off in and around the WTC before any buildings had collapsed?  Hear & see the testimony of the reporters, rescue teams and eyewitnesses who tell a different story of potential demolition charges, unexplained explosions, and vehicles loaded with explosives as reported on live television the morning of Sept. 11, 2001.

Why did a FOX News employee, who witnessed the second tower attack, report seeing no windows on “Flight 175” a commercial United Airlines jetliner?  Why did another eyewitness report that United Airlines Flight 175 was not a commercial airliner?  What kind of plane hit the second tower?

Is there some type of exterior swelling protruding from the undercarriage of “Flight 175” ?  An independently conducted computerized digital analysis says yes.  Where was this "instrument" attached?  How could it have departed from a commercial airport without being noticed?  What purpose did it serve in the attacks?  Full-screen television blow-ups directly from CNN and other mainstream sources reveal the intricate details of this strange anomaly.

"The Pod" Breakthrough Analysis

Flight 175 Anomaly
University Concludes "Pod" Is Three Dimensional Object - Not Shadow

Back in June 2003 La Vanguardia in Barcelona, Spain, published an investigative report on the plane that slammed into the South Tower. The report was a simple affair, it used the photo we see here on the left and wondered what these strange objects attached to the underside of the Flight 175 might be, and whether they were just an optical illusion. After a thorough digital image analysis by a Spanish university, the article came to the conclusion that the objects were three-dimensional in nature and could not have been caused by shadows or reflections.

40 YEAR OLD PLANS FOR 911

Important Information for Understanding the September 11 Attacks

Operation Northwoods
Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities...

America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."

Photos on the United States Air Force Website
Show No Signs of Plane Crash on The Pentagon Lawn

(1.) Where is the 100 ft. crater we were all told about?
Our photographic evidence shows extreme close-ups of the damaged area at the Pentagon. All of the photos show the impact area, however, none of them show a 100 ft. crater. As you will see in the photos at the U.S. Air Force website, NO CRATER. Why was America and the rest of the world given deliberately misleading information that is not supported by the evidence?

(2.) Where is the wreckage from American Airlines Flight #77?
As shown in Chapter 2 of the documentary, there was no sign of wreckage from an airliner hitting the Pentagon - No wings, no tail section, no luggage, no passengers, no landing gear, no engines, no glass from dozens of windows, no fuselage... nothing. Furthermore, photographs that were obtained for this documentary, taken within the first 35 minutes of the attack, clearly confirm that the first ring of the Pentagon had not yet collapsed. Why was America and the rest of the world never shown these photographs?

Please visit the United States Air Force website.
Download the full images and examine them for yourself.
(Do you see the 100 ft. crater? Do you see wings, a tail section, luggage, passengers, landing gear, engines, a fuselage?)

DIRECT LINK TO U.S. Air Force

Considering the fact that I have every second of the Iran/Contra hearings and Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings on tape, not to mention hundreds of hours of other weirdness from the news, it's remarkable I didn't hit the record button on 9/11/2001. I was just too stunned and didn't start recording till the next day.

Big mistake, and 911 In Plane Site shows the depths of that error. The devil's in the details, and though this compilation shows us all the footage we've seen a million times, it also shows us the footage that mysteriously, or not so mysteriously, never got shown again - all the immediate, on the site footage that contradicts the story we've all grown to know and love.

Do you remember there was a giant explosion that shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6, just northwest of the towers before they fell, a totally separate event that clearly had nothing to do with the plane crashes or hijackings, incontrovertible evidence that something else was going on? Neither did I, but 911 In Plane Site has the footage from CNN. Do you remember that the outer wall of the Pentagon didn't fall down until well after the attack, that firefighters stood there fighting a fire at an INTACT Pentagon before the wall came down, a wall with a round hole that clearly wasn't made by an airplane? Neither did I, but 911 In Plane Site has the footage from Fox News. (And just in keeping with the theme of What the Fuck?, do you remember that the FBI found two unexploded bombs in the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Neither did I, but 911 In Plane Site has the footage from local coverage.)

Similarly, we see and hear eyewitnesses actually describing the "cruise missile" that hit the pentagon, some saying they didn't see any windows in the planes that hit the WTCs, others saying the planes definitely didn't have the American Airlines logo.

Source links: 911 In Plane Site The Power Hour U.S. Air Force Desinfoteinment Today