Nina,
the Pinta and the Santa Maria sailed through the area
in 1492, it is reported that Columbus's compass went haywire and
that he and his crew saw weird lights in the sky, but these events
have mundane explanations. From the account in Columbus's journal,
it is thought that his compass's slight inaccuracy stemmed from
nothing more than the discrepancy between true north and magnetic
north. As for the lights, Columbus wrote of seeing "a great flame
of fire" that crashed into the ocean -- probably a meteor. He saw
lights in the sky again on October 11, which, of course, was the
day before his famous landing. The lights, brief flashes near the
horizon, were spotted in the area where dry land turned out to be.
Ship found adrift on December 4, 1872 (some
accounts say December 5), by the Dei Gratia, a bark sailing from
New York to Gibraltar, and considered by many one of the most intriguing
and enduring mysteries in the annals of maritime history.When it
was found, the Mary Celeste was sailing itself alone across the
wide Atlantic. The ship was in first-class condition. Hull, masts,
and sails were all sound. The cargo-barrels of alcohol were still
lashed in place in the hold. There was plenty of food and water.
When he examined the ship's log, the captain of the Dei Gratia found
that the last entry was on November 24. That would have been 10
days earlier, when the Mary Celeste had been passing north of St.
Mary's Island in the Azores — more than 400 miles west of where
it was found. If it had been abandoned
soon after that entry, the ship must have drifted unmanned and unsteered
for a week and a half. Yet this could not have been. The Mary Celeste
was found with its sails set to catch the wind coming over the starboard
quarter: in other words, it was sailing on the starboard tack. The
Dei Gratia had been following a similar course just behind. But
throughout the 400 miles from the Azores, the Dei Gratia had been
obligated to sail on the port tack. It seems impossible that the
Mary Celeste could have reached the spot it did with its yards and
sails set to starboard. Someone must have been working the ship
for at least several days after the final log entry.No one, from
the 10 people that supposedly sailed aboard the Mary Celeste, including
7 crewmen and captain Benjamin Briggs' wife and daughter, was ever
found.The explanation that seemed most reasonable at the time was
the official one put out by the British and American authorities.
This suggested that the crew had got at the alcohol, murdered the
captain and his family, and then somehow escaped to another vessel.
But the story does not really stand up. There were no visible signs
of a struggle on board, and if the crew had escaped, some of them
would surely have turned up later.
The yawl boat — a small four-oared boat
carried over the main hatch — was missing, suggesting that at
least some of the missing people could have left the Mary Celeste
in it.Dozens of theories have been put forward since then, ranging
from attacking monsters from the deep and aliens kidnapping to
nature's wrath, piracy and mutiny. But no one has ever found any
evidence or proof to confirm any of them. The only other evidence
to what really happened may be the so called Fosdyk papers.According
to an article written by a schoolmaster named Howard Linford and
published in 1913 (41 years after the Mary Celeste was found)
in the Strand magazine of London, a well-educated and much-traveled
employee of his named Abel Fosdyk, had left some papers and notes
after his death explaining not only the fate of the crew but also
the curious cut marks that were found in the bows of the Mary
Celeste.Fosdyk claimed that he had been a secret passenger on
the ship's last voyage and the only survivor of the tragedy that
overtook it. Being a close friend of the captain, Fosdyk convinced
Briggs to give him secret passage because, for some undisclosed
reason, he had to leave America in a hurry. During the voyage
Briggs had the ship's carpenter build a special deck in the bow
for his small daughter. It was the supporting struts for this
deck that were slotted into the cuts in the bow planks.
One day, after a lengthy argument with the
mate about how well a man could swim with his clothes on, Briggs
leaped into the water and started swimming around the ship, as
to prove his point. Couple of men followed while the rest of the
crew watched from the deck. Suddenly, one of the sailors swimming
around the bow gave a yell of agony. Everyone, including the captain's
wife and child, crowded onto the newly built deck which promptly
collapsed under their combined weight. They all fell into the
sea, where all were devoured by the sharks that had attacked the
first seaman.Being the only survivor of the shark attacks because
of his luck of falling on top of the shattered decking, Fosdyk
clung to it as the Mary Celeste drifted away. He floated for days
until he was washed up half dead on the northwest coast of Africa.The
Fosdyk papers tell a neat tale. But they offer no solution to
the mystery of how the ship got to where it was found. And they
are wrong on details that should not have escaped an educated
man. Fosdyk says the Mary Celeste weighed 600 tons. In fact, the
ship weighed a third of that. Fosdyk also says that the crewmen
were English, when, in fact, they were mostly Dutch. And most
of all, it seems highly improbable that anyone would go swimming
around a ship that, according to the Dei Gratia evidence, must
have been making several knots at the time. Bizarre as it is,
no better explanation than Fosdyk's has so far emerged. And after
more than 120 years, it is unlikely to do so. The enigma of the
ship that sailed itself seems destined to puzzle us forever
.
"Lost"
Flight 19
At about 2:10 p.m. on the afternoon of 5 December
1945, Flight 19, consisting of five TBM Avenger Torpedo Bombers
departed from the U. S. Naval Air Station, Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
on an authorized advanced overwater navigational training flight.
They were to execute navigation problem No. 1, which is as follows:
(1) depart 26 degrees 03 minutes north and 80 degrees 07 minutes
west and fly 091 degrees (T) distance 56 miles to Hen and Chickens
Shoals to conduct low level bombing, after bombing continue on course
091 degrees (T) for 67 miles, (2) fly course 346 degrees (T) distance
73 miles and (3) fly course 241 degrees (T) distance 120 miles,
then returning to U. S. Naval Air Station, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
In charge of the flight was a senior qualified flight instructor,
piloting one of the planes. The other planes were piloted by qualified
pilots with between 350 and 400 hours flight time of which at least
55 was in TBM type aircraft. The weather over the area covered by
the track of the navigational problem consisted of scattered rain
showers with a ceiling of 2500 feet within the showers and unlimited
outside the showers, visibility of 6-8 miles in the showers, 10-12
otherwise. Surface winds were 20 knots with gusts to 31 knots. The
sea was moderate to rough. The general weather conditions were considered
average for training flights of this nature except within showers.
A radio message intercepted at about 4 p.m. was the first indication
that Flight 19 was lost. This message, believed to be between the
leader on Flight 19 and another pilot in the same flight, indicated
that the instructor was uncertain of his position and the direction
of the Florida coast. The aircraft also were experiencing malfunction
of their compasses. Attempts to establish communications on the
training frequency were unsatisfactory due to interference from
Cuba broadcasting stations, static, and atmospheric conditions.
All radio contact was lost before the exact nature of the trouble
or the location of the flight could be determined. Indications are
that the flight became lost somewhere east of the Florida peninsula
and was unable to determine a course to return to their base. The
flight was never heard from again and no trace of the planes were
ever found. It is assumed that they made forced landings at sea,
in darkness somewhere east of the Florida peninsula, possibly after
running out of gas. It is known that the fuel carried by the aircraft
would have been completely exhausted by 8 p.m. The sea in that presumed
area was rough and unfavorable for a water landing. It is also possible
that some unexpected and unforeseen development of weather conditions
may have intervened although there is no evidence of freak storms
in the area at the time.
All available facilities in the immediate area were used in an effort
to locate the missing aircraft and help them return to base. These
efforts were not successful. No trace of the aircraft was ever found
even though an extensive search operation was conducted until the
evening of 10 December 1945, when weather conditions deteriorated
to the point where further efforts became unduly hazardous. Sufficient
aircraft and surface vessels were utilized to satisfactorily cover
those areas in which survivors of Flight 19 could be presumed to
be located.
One search aircraft was lost during the operation. A PBM patrol
plane which was launched at approximately 7:30 p.m., 5 December
1945, to search for the missing TBM's. This aircraft was never seen
nor heard from after take-off. Based upon a report from a merchant
ship off Fort Lauderdale which sighted a "burst of flame, apparently
an explosion, and passed through on oil slick at a time and place
which matched the presumed location of the PBM, it is believed this
aircraft exploded at sea and sank at approximately 28.59 N; 80.25
W. No trace of the plane or its crew was ever found.