Does TV-, radio channels and newspapers really inform "everything" what happens on our Earth? Could it be so that there is some few key persons who deside what is going to come to cognizance for the general publics "good"?

Did you "knew" anything of all the information on this site? Of course I don't stand for cramming (reading for remembering a lot of information which already exist in the reference books, but a part of the information which is on this homepage don't exist in reference books as in the now completed Swedish Nationalencyclopedian about the Bilderberg Group), but for the curiousity of why the society is as it is today. Must politics, religion, culture and all else, which influence our existence, be as it is today? Is there any possibility to alternation bearing in mind that allmost everything, for instance in politics, are repeating?

The answers to this kind of questions could only you reply to after that you begin to take your responsibility for your thoughts, emotions and actions. Together we could do something valuable. As the life seems to be today have most people handed over their responsibility to some authorities as parents, foremen, governments, politician and/ or even/ "simply" God to solve our problems!

We can gradually change our life if we "just" first begin to observe ourselves how we are thinking, feeling and acting towards our selves and others. Unfortunately we forget our selves and thus our responsibility. It demands simply a new way to see/ perceive oneself.

The Masonery

An Order founded in 1118 by 9 knights to protect the pelgrims. The Templars disapeared in 1314 when the last Grandmaster was burned said the ofiicial sources, but we all know that the masons didn't disepepair, they just split into more secret orders... Masonery, Freemasonery ... later: Rose Croce, Malta's Ridders, Iluminatti, Skulls & Bones, etc.

Grand masters on that period of time:

1. Hugues de Payens 1118 - 1136

2. Robert de Craon 1136 - 1146

3. Everard des Barres 1146 - 1149

4. Bernard de Tremalai 1149-1153

5. Andrew de Montbard 1153 - 1156

6. Bertrand de Blanchefort 1156 - 1169

7. Philip de Milly 1169 - 1170

8. Odo de St. Amand 1170 - 1179

9. Arnold de Torroge 1179 - 1185

10. Gerard de Ridefort 1185 - 1189

11. Robert de Sable 1190- 1193

12. Gilbert Erail 1193 - 1201

13. Philip de le Plaissez 1201 - 1208

14. William de Chartres 1208 - 1218

15. Peter de Montaigue 1218 - 1230

16. Armand de Perigord 1230 -1245

17. William de Sonnac 1245 - 1250

18. Reynald de Vichiers 1250 - 1256

19. Thomas Berard 1256 - 1272

20. William de Beaujeau 1272 - 1291

21. Tibald Gaudin 1291 - 1295

22. Jacques de Molay 1295 - 1314

Their name alludes to their historical headquarters in the Mosque of Omar (a.k.a. "Dome of the Rock") on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, which they renamed Templum Domini. Represented on one of their seals, the structure was believed to be a remnant of the Temple of Jerusalem, and was the model for many Templar churches in Europe, such as the Temple Church in London.

The Knights' involvement in banking grew over time into a new basis for money, as Templars became increasingly involved in banking activities. One indication of their powerful political connections is that the Templars' involvement in usury did not lead to more controversy within the Order and the church at large. The charge was typically sidestepped, by a stipulation that the Templars retained the rights to the production of mortgaged property.

The Templars' political connections and awareness of the essentially urban and commercial nature of the Outremer communities naturally led the Order to a position of significant power, both in Europe and the Holy Land. Their success attracted the concern of many other orders and eventually that of the nobility and monarchs of Europe as well, who were at this time seeking to monopolize control of money and banking after a long chaotic period in which civil society, especially the Church and its lay orders, had dominated financial activities. The Templars' holdings were extensive both in Europe and the Middle East, including for a time the entire island of Cyprus.

The first recorded use of the word lodge in a Masonic context was in 1278 during the building of a Cistercian Monastery at Vale Royal near Chester. Initially the lodge was no more than a rude hut in which the masons worked and possibly took their midday meal. At other sites they may also have slept in the lodge. By 1352 there were elaborate rules governing the behaviour of the mason connected with the lodge at York Minster. These regulations are described as the "ancient customs of the masons" (consuetudines antiquae quibus cementarii). The Master and Deputy Master were required to swear an oath that the ancient customs would be adhered to. Fifty years later all masons were required to swear the same oath. We are not aware of anything esoteric about these customs; they mainly concerned rates of pay, hours of work, holidays etc. However, given the medieval obsession with mysticism it is unlikely that their customs were wholly mundane.

To be continued ...