Bernard Marcoux of Montreal is the 1996 winner of the
BOLS Bridge Press Prize. Here is Marcoux's prize-winning article:
A MAN ABOUT UNIVERSE by Bernard Marcoux
There are no child prodigies at bridge. Why? Be cause
a bridge player needs certain qualities that belong to an adult. The most
needed quality: the agility to think globally, to collect all pertinent clues
and to process them in order to obtain an answer covering all bases --- all of
them.
The great John Crawford once found himself playing a
grand slam, with trumps AKQTxxx facing a singleton, and no losers
anywhere else. While he was pondering (yes, even with
18 tricks, great players make a plan; do you!?) he noticed that no kibitzer was
moving away --- everyone was following play intensely. Crawford reasoned that
if nobody was leaving there was a reason.
Looking at his cards, he found out the only suit with
a possible loser was trumps. That's why the kibitzers were not leaving ---there
might be a problems in trump. Otherwise people, if able to count to 13 tricks,
would have left. So he played a trump to his 10 for 13 tricks, RHO having
started with Jxxx. That's really collecting and using all the evidence.
You know the French expression 'homme du monde' (man about
universe), the former being superficial and shallow, but the latter sagacious,
penetrating, intelligent, visionary. Valery also said that daily events (which
attract the socialite) are like the surf on the sea; the really important events
run deep and only a man about universe, a visionary, a poet, can see them.
You open 1H in fourth seat and find yourself
eventually in 4H without interference. West leads the CA.
Dummy
S
8 7 6
H Q 4
D
A K J 7
C
T 8 6 3
You
S A 4 3
H A K T 8 6 5
D T 8 2
C Q
Fred Gitelman of Toronto shows us here all the
qualities of a man about universe. After the CA, West shifted to the SQ.
Fred ducked and West continued spades to East's king
and Fred's ace. HA, heart to the queen, everyone following. Club ruff to see
what's happening. Nothing. Really nothing?
Let's follow the thoughts of a real bridge player, and
if this trip doesn't leave you in awe, you're missing life itself.
West has passed in first seat (first technical step)
and you know he should have 10 points: C AK and S QJ (second step). So he
should not have the DQ, for he would have opened (third step). If East has the
DQ, you are going down (fourth step). But, to make 10 tricks, you need three diamond
tricks, without losing to the queen (fifth step).
Fred concluded that, in order to make 10 tricks, the
DQ had to be second. Every good technician would have thought along the same
lines. But Fred, man about universe, a poet indeed, saw much further, much
further, and it is here that bridge becomes poetry.
Do you see a finesse in diamonds (sixth step)? Read
again, do you see a finesse in diamonds when you know that the queen is sitting
behind AKJ7? How can you take a losing finesse and still win? The majority of
bridge players, 'hommes du monde' who live at the surface of things, would have
taken the finesse anyway and complained afterwards of their bad luck.
Fred pulled the last trump, pitching a spade, and
played the D AK (seventh step). East's queen fell, as it had to, but Fred
unblocked the 10 and 8 (first step of superior order exclusive to men about
universe, poets, real bridge players)!!! Fred ruffed a club back to his hand
and played the precious D2 to the ever so precious 7 (ninth step) for +450.
You see, you needed a diamond finesse all right and
every socialite can finesse a jack; that's a daily event, obvious on the surf. But
only "homme d'univers", A Man About Universe, can see so deep as to
envision finessing the 7, just for the beauty of it.
Just bidding 4H would have given Fred an aver age;
+450 translated into 99% of the matchpoints. Why can't we obtain 100% when we
play perfectly? Even Fred will tell you that 99% is quite all right, because as
every man about universe will tell you, the 1% left is a reminder that the game
is always greater than the players.
Do you know of a more beautiful game, of a game that
shows us so clearly the fathomless power of the human brain?