Did South do anything wrong? by Alan Truscott
Ken Barbour was West and I was East in the following
layout:
Dlr: South, Vul: N-S
S A 10 6 2
H
A K Q 9 5 2
D
A 6
C
10
S
K 9 7 4
S Q J 3
H
J 10 7 3
H 8 4
D J 8 3 D K 10 7 2
C 7 3 C
Q J 9 6
S 8 5
H
6
D
Q 9 5 4
C
A K 8 5 4 2
WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH
- - -
Pass
Pass 1H Pass 2C
Pass 2S Pass 3C
Pass 3H Pass 3NT
All
Pass
A diamond was led and ducked to the king. East
returned the CQ, seriously damaging South's communications. South won with the
ace and played the top hearts. He then cashed the DA and led a fourth heart, leaving
West on lead in this position:
S
A 10 6 2
H
9 5
D ---
C ---
S K 9 7 4
S Q J 3
H --- H
---
D J
D ---
C 7
C J 9 6
S 8 5
H
---
D
Q 9
C
K 8
West could have led the SK, providing for a singleton
honor in the South hand, but that seemed unlikely. He did the best he could to
deal with the actual layout by leading the S9. This was covered with the 10 and
jack, and when the queen was led South could not escape defeat.
We were pleased with our defense. But could South have
done better?
In the ending South should not have wasted dummy's
S10. He could have survived by winning the SA, cashing one heart (preferably not two) and leading a low spade.
But the main problem came in the original planning. South
should have won the first trick with the DA and played hearts. This would have preserved
his communications and guaranteed nine tricks, barring a terrible heart split. As
it was, after winning the second trick, it would have been wise to cash the
second club winner.
A spot of torture -- tortured by spots by Alan
Truscott
My team was only 9 IMPs behind the top-seeded Mike
Levine team going into the final session of the Senior Knockout semifinal. The
fourth deal was a turning-point.
Dlr: East, Vul: Both
S
A J 8 4
H
A K 10 6
D 9 5
C
Q 9 8
S K 10 3 2 S 7
H J 9 7 3 H Q 8 5 4
D 8 7 D
A K Q 10 6 2
C
K 7 3
C 10 2
S Q 9 6 5
H
2
D
J 4 3
C A J 6 5 4
WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH
- - 1D Pass
1H Pass 4H Pass
Pass Dbl Pass 4S
Dbl
All Pass
East and West were using a Precision-type system in
which the opening was limited to about 15 points and the 1H response to about
10 points. East's surprising leap to 4H was based on the expectation that 4H
would have some play and that he would shut out the opponents' likely spade
fit. He proved to be wrong on both counts.
North's double was intended to be for penalties, and
he would probably have collected 500. But South was unsure and tried 4S. West
doubled, not wishing to hear any more about hearts, and led a diamond.
Three diamond plays would have forced the dummy and
insured a one-trick defeat. But South threw the DJ quickly, and after taking
two winners East was unsure about the location of the last diamond. He shifted
to the C10, and Chuck Said, as South, took full advantage of the opportunity.
He won with the ace and led the SQ, covered by the
king and ace. South cashed two heart winners, throwing his remaining diamond,
and ruffed a heart to reach this position:
S J 8 4
H
10
D
--
C
Q 9
S 10 3 2 S --
H J H Q
D -- D K 10 6 2
C K 7 C 2
S
9 6
H
--
D --
C J 6 5 4
South led a low club, and as West I inspected the
position and searched in vain for a way out. I was tortured by the spade spots.
If I took the CK, South would unblock the queen. Then my S10 would be trapped
whether I returned a heart, a club or a trump. After a club return, for
example, South would win and lead a trump for a finesse, with the CJ as the
next winner for South to trap West.
If West does not cover the SQ, the play is similar.
South takes the top hearts, throwing a diamond, and ruffs a heart. Again, a low
club is led and West has no escape.
I congratulated Said on his excellent play. His team
gained 12 IMPs when they might have lost 8, and was on the way to victory in
the semifinal and, eventually, the event.