DOWN WITH ANY ELITE
are you against Bush?
September 22 2005
Past presidents were
involved in many wars of which the Korean War, the Vietnam War and
the First Gulf War are the most well-known. Poverty in the world was
and is also caused by the American way of trading, cruel dictators
were and are supported and anyone that wants to try something
different is attacked. Illnesses are still rampant because of the
high price of medicines.
Maybe you still
believe the American way of life is beneficial for all people on the
world. But then you have to explain why
misery does not seem to end, why illiteracy
is hardly becoming smaller, why half of the world is still living on
less than two dollars a
day or why twenty percent of all African children are still dying
before they reach the age of five – mostly because of avoidable
I do not understand
why people are so opposed to Bush – and not to other leaders who
are comparable. Bush sr
invaded also Iraq, Kennedy invaded Vietnam, Clinton lowered the
federal contribution to build dikes in
By being opposed to
Bush alone the suggestion arises that other leaders (who belong to
the same privileged group) will be better. That is rubbish. Problems
will not be solved by removing Bush, his successors will hardly
be better for the massworld.
not direct your wrath against Bush alone, Democrats are not better.
I propose that
masspeople withdraw from the political games that are played by
leading people that never will try to make one world for all people.
That can only change when masspeople develop their own creative,
individual and autonomous way of acting.
When you want to
receive an e-mail message each time I publish a new article,
need a new political paradigm
To the index of All Letters