|
DOWN WITH ANY ELITE |
|
Do not react, act autonomously! |
| Amsterdam,
October 11 2007
Dear reader,
A flea looks for a unguarded place on a human body to suck some
blood. One bite is a nuisance many bites are terrible. That has to change! In the eigthies I participated in the Anti Nuclear Movement that reacted against a Dutch nuclear plant. Thousands of masspeople blockaded the plant. I took part but also proposed the slogan “The nuclear plant is everywhere!” Directors do not live in the plant, neither do scientists that make nuclear energy possible. Many firms supply the plant with food, drink and materials, dispose the nuclear waste or distribute and use nuclear energy. There is a multitude of targets that are not as well guarded as the nuclear plant. Only sometimes “other targets” were attacked for example by sabotaging electricity supply lines or by a demonstration in front of the house of a atom physicist. Most political energy was concentrated on the nuclear plant. The result was a clash with the police and not the closing down of the plant. Wars between indigenous masses and occupying armies are different. Nearly always the masses won. Vietnam, Indonesia, Somalia, Cuba, Nicaragua and now Afghanistan and Iraq. They fight like fleas, they attack on weak points and are not led by what the occupying army is doing. When the Americans amass troops in Baghdad, insurgents go elsewhere. I only wonder why insurgents do not expand the war to the heartland of the occupiers. There have been few attacks on weak points in Western countries. In the end the masses of the occupying countries will turn against their leaders because they cannot live anymore the life they lived before. This is not new. Sun Tzu wrote already in the
sixth century BC in “The Art of War”: To get rid of any elite I propose the same policy. Do not react on what the elite is doing but make it impossible for elitepeople to live the safe, privileged and prosperous life they live now. Undermine the power basis of the elite and not its decisions. The Americans did not withdraw from Vietnam
because they thought that Vietnamese had the right to be
independent. The decisive factor was fifty thousand dead Americans.
Therefore the American masses rallied, the life they lived before
was being threatened. The rightist Dutch-Israeli war historian Martin van Creveld (“The evolution of war”) is very negative about the chances of the Americans in Iraq. The French and the Americans in Vietnam, the Soviets in Afghanistan or the Dutch in Indonesia lost wars against insurgent masses. The military strongest party had to withdraw. Van Creveld did learn from the past that all wars in foreign countries are a morass in which foreigners will drown. This historical lesson is not understood by Western activists. They do not realise that the elite can be undermined by independent attacks on weak points. Then elitepeople will realise that it will not be anymore possible to have it always better than the rest of the population. The central point is always that actions should make life in the eliteworld less agreeable. When elitepeople realise they cannot live anymore the privileged life they lived before, they will not anymore support decisions of the top elite. Than the possibility for a world without elites will come around. The War of the Flea takes time but the future is bright. When the number of flea pricks will increase signs of decay will appear in the eliteworld. But the present-day activists only try to improve the situation of the masses and do not attack the reason why the situation of the masses is subordinate. They do not invade the eliteworld, but only fight for improvements within the framework set by the elite. For further ideas about the War of the Flea see Letter 32 and Letter 88. Yours truly, Joost van Steenis |
|
When you want to receive about twice a month my
new contributions to my
site, |
| 93.
Naomi Klein To the index of All Letters HOME |