"The vast accumulation of knowledge--or at least of information--deposited by the nineteenth century have been responsible for an equally vast ignorance." - T.S. Eliot
Since the only possible way of preventing the same thing from happening in this century and the next is by a careful cataloguing of available knowledge, that is what this page sets out to do. If you wish to make any additions, please send a mail to A.vanArum@cable.a2000.nl, with as a subject title "Books on Eliot."
Quick list of books by author
Akroyd's excellent biography is the current favourite, and justly so. Little fault can be found with this work, which achieves almost exactly what it sets out to do - to provide the reader with a detailed account of Eliot's life, and particularly those years in which Eliot produced his poetry. If there are any holes to be punched in this work, they are going to be in the psychological profile, which is a little shaky on certain points.
T.S. Eliot Annual No. 1.
Contains interesting article on Eliot and Ulysses.
Bush, Ronald. (Ed.)
Childs brilliantly combines rigid critical thinking and detailed literary background with a detailed examination of the actual poetry. Special interest in this book is human relations. Childs is clearly a specialist in his field, is detailed and accurate - an example to many of the more 'loose' autobiographical critics featured on these pages.
Crawford has studied Eliot's study material and writings in great detail, which help him shed fresh light on otherwise repetetive discussions of the poems. This book does much more than many others and is recommended almost without reservation; the almost is due to a few obvious oversights and that Eliot's schoolwork, even in combination with Frazer, cannot explain everything.
"It examines various drafts of FQ that were preserved, and
reconstructs, through Eliot's correspondence (largely with one John Hayward), how many of
the changes came to be made. It also has good discussions of FQ not directly tied to
the drafts. I found it more enlightening re: Eliot's creative process and allusions
than anything else I've read, including the WL manuscript."
A detailed and compact introduction to Eliot's poetry and although the title stresses time, Ms Gish's book is a good start for anyone interested in the poems. The work covers everything from Prufrock to Four Quartets.
Important historical piece of literary criticism, and the first to treat the modernist movement as a historical movement rather than a contemporary one. The authors are both poets themselves.
Antony Julius' well-known book deals mainly with the issue of anti-semitism in T.S. Eliot's work. His approach is one of 'presumed guilty' and his method is of selecting as much evidence 'against' Eliot, which is fairly convincing, although doubt has been cast on his method and selection of evidence. The merit of this book lies mainly in the detailed and knowledgeable representation of the different forms of anti-Semitism that existed in Eliot's time. Like many other critics, Julius fails to pay sufficient attention to the works Eliot refers or alludes to.
For what the title proposes to do I believe that the Quillian book on Joyce and Eliot (Hamlet and the New Poetic) is a better introduction - it discusses in much more detail how Eliot fitted into a literary critical tradition, by offering the reader many influential extracts from the critics preceding and influencing Eliot. Lobb's book, however, is a good introductory discussion of the social and historical cultural context on a more general level (rather than that of Hamlet, for instance), and gives a detailed overview of practically all of Eliot's criticism.
Hovers probably a little bit too much over the surface of the works for today's critic, but his cultural and social view of Eliot's poetry, prominent throughout the book, is closer to Eliot's own life and times and from that perspective interesting and informative.
A good collection of essays. Particularly James Longenbach's very informed discussion of Eliot's allusive practice deserves mention. To quote: "it is ultimately more important to understand the nature of Eliot's allusive practice - to ask not only what is the source? but why does Eliot allude? and how do we experience the allusion?" (p. 176)
Moody, A. David.
A broad discussion of Eliot as a poet. I find myself often surprised how Moody clings to certain points of view despite his own evidence. Whether this is due to a lack of insight or a lack of knowledge, I cannot tell. Perhaps it is a lack of scientific rigor, which is a more common fault in the field.
Moody, A. David
Useful place to start if this is your angle on the poetry, but not particulary enlightning otherwise.
Discusses the shift in perception of Shakespeare's play during the Modernist age, by closely examining Joyce and Eliot's literary criticism of Hamlet and contrasting it mainly with the Victorian perception of the play. Obviously essential reading for anyone interested in Eliot's essay on Hamlet, but also very useful for anyone interested in Eliot as a critic in general, and for understanding the sections in the poetry in which Eliot refers to Hamlet (see influences).
A detailed study of Eliot's poetical technique, following the development from Prufrock to the Four Quartets. It pays close attention to rhythm and the influences, particularly the French, which shaped them. The only one on this page at this moment which does so, and as such very valuable.
Christopher Ricks' book approaches T.S. Eliot's complex relation with prejudice in a broader, friendlier and somewhat more scholarly way than other books on this subject, and this is probably the book to read first. Nevertheless, it has its faults too: written in a rather loosely and Ricks' the biographer is overly prominent in this book.
Detailed discussion of the early writings with an eye on Eliot's American background. Much better than its counterpart "The English T.S. Eliot." (not currently featured on these pages). Many unfortunate faults have been made in interpreting the evidence gathered, but the evidence itself is good and helpful.
Highly recommended for anyone interested in Eliot's poetic method in general, especially of the earlier work, and obviously the Bleistein poems in particular. A must read for any academic whose work touches upon (supposed) anti-Semitism, the Bleistein and Sweeney poems, and Eliot's method of allusion and satire. Shyamal Bagchee, who wrote the introduction, is the Vice-President of the T. S. Eliot Society and the founder of the Yeats-Eliot Review.
This study is old, but a good place to start. Good about this book is that it has collected a lot of the sources for Eliot's allusionary poetry. Bad about this book is that Sources and Meaning seem to have been studied wholly separately. Fourty-eitght years later, we would still rather like to see a study of the meaning of the sources.
The most comprehensive selection of annotations and introductions to the Selected Poems available. This is the book to start with for any student or scholar; it also recommends other books when appropriate. Southam writes clear, concise, knowledgeable and uptodate - so that it is also recommended you get the latest edition. Strongest weakness is that it does not at this point identify sources very well, listing only a number of book at the end.
Wilk's conclusion is, like Julius, that Eliot had strong anti-Semitic tendencies. The method and approach of this book does not differ significantly from Ricks or Julius in that respect, nor do the conclusions.
When compared to the the likes of Grover Smith, who published his work only three years before, initially this work seems limited and shallow - but upon closer inspection, its very concise discussions are detailed and as good as most others and provide a good starting point.