Straightforward Modifications |
||||||||||||
| This section describes some straighforward modifications, that can be carried out without too much hassle. | ||||||||||||
Changing tubesThe original kit contained National EL-34 tubes, and I can't even remember the brand of the ECC82 and ECC83 tubes anymore (although I can remember that turning on the amp made the heaters of the ECC82s light up very heavily for a moment). The original tubes sound a bit harsh, and not so refined. After a couple of months I've changed all the tubes to Golden Dragon tubes. The first few years I've used these tubes with great fun, and without any problems whatsoever. The overall sound, compared to the original tubes, is more "massive", and also a bit more "refined". Later, after changing the topology of the amp as well, I've changed the ECC83s to Mullard E83CCs, and the EL-34s to Philips. I've performed a lot of experiments with different brands, and here are some (not all, I've listened to many more tubes) of my findings (vague, cryptic, imprecise, and non-technical): |
||||||||||||
ECC83:
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
EL34:
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Please remind that these findings are personal, and that they heavily depend on the topolgy of the amp, the interaction with the speakers (in my case Audio Note E), and the source used (which is a DIY-DAC). For more info on EL34, see the interesting pages of Jogi. |
||||||||||||
Changing coupling capacitorsI've changed the ERO coupling capacitors by Audio Note / Jensen paper-in-oil types. This result in more brilliant treble, and a wider sound stage.The choice of this cap has also been motivated by some "toy-" test, where we've put different types of caps between a CD player and an amp. The paper-in-oil cap was the only cap that seemed to have no audible impact compared to the situaion where no cap was applied. In the DIY-DAC I've applied a copper-foil type, which again was a big step forward. I'm considering to perform those caps in my amp as well. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
Changing the volume control and by-passing balanceI've changed the original volume control with a Noble volume control. It's not straightforward to mount this control, but it's worth the effort. I've by-passed the balance control, because I don't use it. The sound becomes 'cleaner'. I'm currently considering an ALPS Blue Velvet for this experiment. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
Eliminate the switch, apply silver wireI only use a CD player for my amp, so I've decided to by-pass the switch as well, and get rid of that strange computer cable out of my amp. I've used a very thin single strand silver wire, isolated with teflon for that. The results are stunning. More direct sound, much clearer. |
||||||||||||
Eliminate overall feedbackOverall feedback results in a higher overall bandwidth, and a lower output impedance. Inside the Classic, the overall feedback is about 11dB. The feedback can be influenced by changing R51 (and R48). By shortcutting these 2 resistors, the overall feedback will be eliminated in both channels. Lowering the overall feedback is not interesting for all of you. Some speakers become 'fluffy' in the bass. If you consider lowering the feedback, I would suggest to perform audible experiments, because the effects become very apparant if things go wrong. For this purpose, I just apply a potmeter over the resistance, so that I can experiment very quickly. If the effect works for you, the result is a overall improvement of dynamics and imaging. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
Triode ModeThe Classic is based on an ultra-linear output stage. The screen grid of a penthode is attached to an additional tap on the end tranformer. The screen grid will vary in a certain ratio of the anode, order of magnitude 43%. In essence this is a form of local feedback. The characteristics of a stage like this is between a penthode and triode operation of the tube. The goal is to increase linearity. The output stage can be modified to a triode-mode stage (see the copy of this Sound Practices article for some backgrounds). For this purpose, the screen grid should be loosened from the transformer, and attached to the anode via a resistor (see the thick wire in the scheme below, which has to be done for all 4 output tubes). The effect is a rich harmonic sound. The reduction of power could be a problem with low efficiency speakers, but the audible effect is as if the amplifier has even more power. Detailed info about push-pull amplifier topologies can be found at TubeCAD., which is a web version of the original article by David Hafler in Audio Engineering, November 1951. Norman Crowhurst explains that each topology is appropiate, but it should be implemeted properly. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
All of this combinedThe results of all these modifications combined gave me a lot of pleasure. The musical performance of the amplifier seems to have increased drastically. It is as if a thick curtain in front of the speakers has been removed. I've measured only the output impedance of the whole, which is 4.8 Ohms on the 8 Ohm tap, and 2.5 Ohms on the 4 Ohm tap. This implies that the speaker should be very easy to drive, making these modifications not generally applicable! |
||||||||||||