Media |
||
MusicMusic is where it is all about, so here are some links to obtain music.
Some notes about the music industryThe music industry claims it suffers from loss of revenues. An article on BBC news, as well as the following figure show that this is simply not true: As can be seen from the figure, there is an increase in the sale of (music) DVDs, which compensates for the minor drop in sales of music CDs. People spend a ratio of their income to entertainment, and there are shifts in different technologies. DVDs are also considered to be more value for the money. The idea of selling 60 minutes of music on a disc, probably only a few songs of real interest to people, is getting more and more old fashioned with the raise of online music stores and jukeboxes where thousands of selected songs can be shuffled. The music industry claims they loose money due to illegal copying of music through internet. Though I'm not advocating copying illegal music at all, I strongly object against the reasoning that each illegal copied song is loss of income. In economic science there is a thing called "price index", which means that at a lower (higher) price more (less) products are being sold. In practice, this means that if people have to pay for all the music they have, they would simply have less music. So, loss of income cannot be connected to each illegal song out there. But again, this does not validate illegal copying at all. But the billions loss of income claimed by the music industry is a hoax as well! Copy Protection
What is wrong with all of this?Protecting the property and income of the artist is a good thing, no argument about that. However, copy protection has some very nasty side effects:
It is clear that the music industry prioritizes protection of music contents above customer friendliness. I'm not favouring a music-is-free-for-everybody situation at all, music should be bought through legal channels, but I'm against a system not making a difference between legal and illegal usage of music. Each customer is considered to be a potential guilty copier, as shown by the fair amount of royalties put on the price of CD-Rs. As far as I understood legal systems, a person is not guilty unless proven otherwise. For the music industry different rules seem to apply. Incredible... Basically, I never saw a difference between a normal CD and a copy protected CD, because my Macintosh never had any problem accepting and reading a copy protected CD. For persons having problems with copy protected CDs, hacks seem to exist. This shows that illegal practices won't be stopped by this protection, any protection can be easily bypassed. I guess the music industry will keep working on making copying impossible, but spokesman of CD-R devices say they will patch their equipment such that copy protections will be by-passed. The result the music industry achieved so far is that I refuse to buy any copy protected CD. The first copy-protected CD I bought by accident (Massive Attack 100th Window) refused to play in one of my CD players, so I brought it back to the shop immediately. I hope that lots of other people will do the same, so that a clear signal is given to the music industry that we expect normal playable CDs, not the crap they are selling now. Links
© Copyright (but not copy protected) 2003, Marc Heijligers |
||