following feature seems to be a first in amateur radio.
I found some notes referring to the same technique in a few patents, but
I didn't find a single amateur or commercial pseudo doppler RDF offering
the following feature...
Hunting airborne radio
sources like weather balloons (radiosondes) using the doppler RDF, the
following question will be unavoidable:
How high is the darned thing flying?...
Well, we don't have a simple or straight answer to that questiion, but
there is a simple way to extract some elevation information from your
In a normal setup, the doppler tone has its maximum amplitude for
signals originating from the earth surface.
For an elevated source, like an airplane or balloon, the doppler
amplitude will be slightly smaller, because for that signal the antenna
separation distance seems to be a little bit smaller.
If we would increase the elevation of the source, the doppler amplitude
would reduce further until it would drop to zero when the source is
right on top of your antenna.
This doppler amplitude reduction simply follows a sine function.
I used this effect to add a simple elevation indicator to my Version 1
The add-on box on the right side of the RDF has a 10 LED indicator to
give an approximate of the elevation.
I had to take out the ALC of course, otherwise it would cancel any
Then I take the filtered doppler tone right before it is fed into the
zero crossing detector, and feed it into a LED VU meter.
This VU meter is upside down, so maximum level lights the bottom LED.
This bottom LED is the point to calibrate the input level to on a low
Any reduction of the doppler amplitude will now cause the LED VU meter
to climb up until it reaches the "almost zero" point: Zenith!
Remember, this is not about the RF signal strength, this about the
doppler signal strength.
Reduced antenna separation distance means reduced phase jump magnitudes
in the FM receiver and thus reduced doppler tone amplitude.
Obviously, there are a lot of parameters that may have an impact on the
Therefore, the elevation indicator will be reliable only on strong,
But that is exactly what we have when driving below a radiosonde.
In field tests the accuracy turned out to be fair, but far less than the
azimuth accuracy, which makes sense of course.
However it does add a bit of useful information to the
That's why I added this feature to my current mobile RDF platform: